Ratings system at AFP
Might have the opposite effect? If you label something XXX, more people will probably click on it, I'm guessing.
"There is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."
I am guessing that some people might not set their options and accidentally let little eyes see things they should not see.
As we grow up, we learn that even the one person that wasn't supposed to ever let you down probably will. You will have your heart broken probably more than once and it's harder every time. You'll break hearts too, so remember how it felt when yours was broken.
You'll cry because time is passing too fast, and you'll eventually lose someone you love. So take too many pictures, laugh too much, and love like you've never been hurt because every sixty seconds you spend upset is a minute of happiness you'll never get back.
just4fun - well, basically, now it's like that. that is, all the content's pretty much out there by default. should we default to just showing tamer content? if so, we'd have to label it - or all content going forward...
Bard - D'oh, you've discovered my master plan. Heh.
Just put Salmon Fan and Irish in the title..Better than a X rating...lol
Like stars
across the sky … . E per avvincere ….. Tu
dovrai vincere ...
We were born to shine …All of us here
because we believe......
What do you guys think about a way to label/mark posts (and other content - photos, videos, audio, etc...) with a rating - G, PG, R - then somewhere to set defaults for what type of content you want to see ...
Would be fairly easy to implement (I think...)
Kind of like an 'ignore' option but not ignoring a user but a type of content?
Hmm...